A Life in Science piece on the Glacier Bay trip was published in Science this week. It's small, but fun to get the daily chaos of the National Geographic expedition into print, however slight. It's a reminder of how the things that are the most uncertain of success are often the most rewarding.
It has been a busy few months wrapping up the semester, prepping for fieldwork, and planning a lab/home move to Colorado. Fun stuff.
The new email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
Using the lovely study system of yellow-cedar, a new paper explores climate-induced mortality of a different sort than the usual threshold type mortality. Once I started looking at the whole range, it became apparent that it wasn't so much the climate was too warm for yellow-cedar, but rather the transition from cold-to-warm was detrimental. In fact, very healthy populations are in quite warm environments. This led to the conclusion, supported by weather station data spanning about 10 degrees of latitude, that mortality is indeed associated with the transition rather than a threshold per se.
The fascinating result is that in this case, slower warming (longer time in the transition) may lead to increased mortality. It can be captured with a simple binomial model, where the odds for a mortality event are commensurate with the time of exposure climatically and the probability of a thaw-freeze event during that time. This structure matches the observed data pretty well, though limited data in southeast Alaska (primarily due to a lack of weather stations, and non-random location of those stations) means we're still generally in the hypothesis stage and can't make really concrete conclusions yet - need to move into better instrumented areas and retest (it's science - always retest!). But it's compelling, and this could be a useful concept in other places.
The manuscript will be coming out in Ecosphere:
Buma B. Transitional climate mortality: Slower warming may result in increased climate-induced mortality in some systems. Ecosphere. In press.
The NSF RCN coordinated through our lab, the Alaska Coastal Rainforest Center, and the University of Washington is having its annual meeting this week. The focus is from an "end user" perspective, so we're taking the aquatic flux information from the first meeting, the terrestrial carbon products that we've been working on, and then focusing on where that material ends up - the ocean.
During this second workshop we will bring together a select group of oceanographers, biogeochemists, biologists, modellers and others interested in processes occurring at the land-sea interface in temperate regions. Although the workshop will focus heavily on the Pacific Coast, our findings are expected to have applications to temperate coastal rainforest domains globally.
Through this multi-disciplinary forum we aim to evaluate the current state of the knowledge of the terrestrial-marine system in the PCTR with respect to five key topics:
- Physics – freshwater controls of coastal hydrodynamics;
- Biochemistry – micro and macronutrient subsidies and their bioavailability to marine ecosystems; carbonate chemistry;
- Food webs – contributions and pathways of freshwater & terrestrial subsidies to marine food webs;
- Estuaries – the land-sea interface and role of estuarine ecosystems in modifying terrestrial outputs;
- Drivers of change – e.g., land use and climate.
Each topic will be introduced by key speakers, followed by discussion to define scope, discuss the current state of knowledge, distill and summarize data gaps, and identify future research directions. Our goal is to solidify a scientific community and build a research agenda on processes acting across temperate rainforest coastal margins.
We should have at least one manuscript come out of this, and are having an extra day of writing - Saturday. For more info, send me an email: email@example.com or see the website (link at top of page).
Edit: This did not get posted on time, unfortunately. Thanks to all that attended! The lecture was live cast via Facebook, and should still be available (as are all the previous ones) on the Mendenhall Glacier Facebook page.
I will be giving the Mendenhall Lecture tonight, at the Glacier Visitor Center. The talk will be on work in Glacier Bay related to the William S. Cooper successional plots, their inception back in 1916, and what we can learn from the longest running permanent plot network of its kind in the world. Most of the talk will be about the expedition to find the plots - how old maps, notes, and pictures were utilized, the challenges of adjusting for changing declination and sealevels, and fun stuff like that!
Also note that over the next couple weeks there are some great talks by Liz Graham on pests in Alaskan forests (spruce beetle, spruce aphid, pine beetle) and a rare, but really interesting, alpine tsunami by Rick Edwards. In the Heen Latinee, where my group has done considerable work, a very large rockfall-turned-debris slide crashed into an alpine lake, sending a huge wall of water splashing out the other side, ripping up the forest for miles down from the lake in a wide swath of disturbance, finally running out into Berners Bay as a large pulse of water. Cool stuff! With our lidar biomass maps, we are hoping to calculate the biomass loss from the event - next steps!
Science, especially the science of ecosystems and change, needs symbols. It needs those symbols to communicate the importance of the change we're quantifying - change which is sometimes incremental but inexorable, adding up to large changes over big areas.
Species migration is one such incremental thing, hard to communicate the significance but important - at a global scale.
In a new project funded by National Geographic, I'll be leading an expedition to Cape Horn, an expedition which is intended to link science and storytelling, ultimately providing us with a single focal point for change, a point which folks can visit virtually. Together with scientists from the Universidad de Magallanes, Portland State, the University of North Texas, the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, and the University of Alaska, we're going to find the world's southernmost tree - the ultimate treeline, if you will. This individual - no doubt stunted but alive - can function as a symbol or signpost, marking the edge of forests as they creep poleward. We'll establish a strong a quantitative baseline as we can such that future generations can use that focal point as an easily communicable marker of human induced change (there's other science, including using the point as an anchor for regional NDVI work, comparison to other points in Patagonia, and other aspects of course!).
The project is truly focused on storytelling and communicating the science of change - communication of that point (thanks to Google Earth, one will be able to virtually visit) and that landscape. The region is home to a vibrant ecological and human community, including amazing efforts like the Cape Horn Biosphere reserve, exciting initiatives like the "Tourism with a hand lens" project to explore the fascinating plant life at our feet, and a long cultural legacy of life at the edge of the world. Thankfully, we'll have a professional writer and photographer along to spread the word about this unique place.
Updates will become more frequent as the expedition nears. Thanks to National Geographic for their support, and I'm looking forward to a great (no doubt challenging) expedition. Team members (so far) include Ricardo Rozzi, Juan Armesto, Andres Holz, Glenn Wright, Craig Welch, and myself.
Today I'll be on Reddit talking about the National Geographic sponsored expedition to rediscover the William S. Cooper plots, our success, and how it's now the longest running, time-zero permanent succession plot in the world.
The trip involved navigating by 1916 charts, looking for X's painted on rocks above buried metal markers, metal detectors, old compass bearings and paces, and kayaking in the back of Glacier Bay.
Above - old maps showing the "emergence" of Glacier Bay, from the 1700's via a Russian map to the 1940's. This rapid emergence of a whole landscape is unique, and the reason why it's such a special place to study ecological communities.
The whole project was a success, and was followed up by a more recent trip where we expanded our data collection efforts to include bacterial and fungal functional diversity, spatial mapping of individual trees, dendrochronology, and broad-scale assessment of tree patterns via stem mapping and remote sensing. It's a big project, but amazing as well.
Overall the plots are providing a wealth of information on how plant communities assemble, change, and adapt to rapidly changing climates - Glacier Bay has been undergoing substantial warming for over a century thanks to the Little Ice Age, so it's a great laboratory for how landscapes will change worldwide with anticipated (and observed) warming.
Lots of soil data as well. The first results are below, but work is ongoing on the broader scale patterns (samples collected, in process for publication).
Not a lot of patterns, other than carbon tends to accumulate over time - interestingly, this is independent of the actual species composition. Two of these plots are dominated by nitrogen fixing species, but the remainder aren't - and some never have been. This undermines assumptions by some that nitrogen limits early colonization of "late" successional species. They do just fine, assuming limited competition.
And as always, none of this was or is possible without the whole team of collaborators: Sarah Bisbing (University of Nevada Reno), John Krapek, Glenn Wright, Greg Wiles, and Allison Bidlack, as well as the help of Glacier Bay National Park, the University of Minnesota archives team, and funding from National Geographic and the University of Alaska.
We are partnering with the Rural Alaska Honors Institute (https://www.uaf.edu/rahi/) to get rural high school students into university-level education. This is a great opportunity - we are looking to hire two students to work all summer studying plant population and community recovery after fires. You'll gain experience working with scientists in the field - not just plants, but also permafrost scientists, computer modelers, and soil scientists working on bacterial populations. There's room to design your own project to take back to your village as well.
The position will run from late May to August, 2018. Positions for 2019 will be made available next year.
If you're interested, contact Brian Buma (firstname.lastname@example.org). However, many will be familiar with Denise Wartes, who recruits for RAHI - she's going to be contacting high schools from Kake to Akiak.
Guess which site has mass yellow-cedar mortality?
Yellow-cedar mortality is well described, resulting from a physiological adaptation which takes advantage of historically reliable climatic cues for its phenology - specifically, cedar de-cold hardens early in the spring to take advantage of post-winter nitrogen availability. Historically, deep snows have protected it from cold snaps and root freezing. The lack of winter snow resulting from 1) emerging from the Little Ice Age and 2) anthropogenic warming is making those phenological stages vulnerable to freeze damage and mortality results.
Lab and greenhouse experiments have found that -5 C soil temperatures are, more or less, the point at which damage occurs in non-hardened individuals (they are quite cold tolerant earlier in the winter). This requires a combination of cold air masses and a lack of snow, which generally only occur in areas where the mean winter temperatures are near zero - random forest modeling suggests that the 0 to -5 C mean temperature of the coldest month is the best predictor of where mortality occurs.
But climate change is, well, changing. For more typical climate-induced mortality, like traditional physiological tolerance thresholds, a climate shifts and a whole landscape is changed - everything crosses. But if the mortality and phenological mismatch is tied to a BAND of climate, like it appears here, then we have some interesting potential implications.
Specifically, this suggests that elevated rates of climate-induced mortality is temporary, assuming the climate keeps changing. Eventually, as in the figure, you'll come out "on the other side." Then mortality rates should decline. Since mortality is usually triggered by proximal events (in this case, low snow + cold snap), it won't happen every year - so faster warming may, surprisingly, result in lower mortality overall because less time is spent in the transitional mortality zone (again, see figure).
A paper detailing this, using yellow-cedar as a model organism and successfully predicting observed mortality rates based on weather station and climate data, is in review.
The Mendenhall Fireside Lectures are always a highlight of winter - free and open to all, each Friday. There are, as always, quite a few good ones lined up.
A couple of note: My collaborator and the director of the Heen Latinee Experimental Forest, Rick Edwards, will be reporting on a dramatic happening in our beloved experimental forest, a large rockfall and alpine tsunami which caused some very impressive destruction along the upper reaches of the watershed, and a wall of water which made it down to the ocean. That is February 9th (6:30 and 8PM).
I will be giving a lecture on work in Glacier Bay and the story of the rediscovery of the Cooper plots - the challenges in finding 100 year old sites in the wilderness, backcountry navigation, and all that. It will cover work in 2016 and 2017 - as well as into the future. That will be January 26th, 6:30 and 8PM.
There are also many interesting talks on mining, transboundary mine issues (a major concern re: pollution, salmon stocks, and social issues), kayaking the Inside Passage, and others.